Effect of Porosity on Mechanical Properties of Die cast Aluminum Engine Block

  • Feroz Shah Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Mohammad A. Irfan Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Kareem Akhtar Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2476-0509
  • Abdul Shakoor Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Naeem Khan Department of Electrical Engineering, Bannu Campus, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan
Keywords: Porosity, Engine block, Computer Tomography

Abstract

Casting imperfections, especially porosity in Aluminum alloy engine block plays a major role in determining the mechanical properties. An experimental study was carried out to investigate porosity in samples taken from different locations of the engine block, i.e. thick and thin sections. The samples were extracted from thick and thin sections of the engine block, having section thicknesses of 20 mm and 5 mm, respectively. Mechanical testing of these samples was carried out to show effect of section thickness and its associated porosity on ductility and ultimate strength. The three-dimensional porosity of an AA 384.1 engine block was analyzed through computed tomography (CT) scan. Samples from thick and thin sections within the engine block were analyzed to investigate the effect of different cooling rates. Volumetric porosity for thin sections was within the range of 0.0875% to 0.15% while that for the thick sections it was 0.24% to 0.35%. Mechanical properties of the samples with thin sections were compared to that of thick sections. It was found that thin sections have higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and ductility as compare to thick sections. Consequently, thin sections show lesser volumetric porosity as compare to thick sections. The results show that the samples taken from a portion near the mould wall or cooling core have fine grain size, lesser porosity and hence higher ductility. While the samples taken from the portions away from mould wall or cooling core has higher porosity and lower ductility. The overall volumetric porosity for thin sections is lower than thicker sections.

Author Biographies

Kareem Akhtar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Department of Mechanical Engineering,

UET Peshawar

Naeem Khan, Department of Electrical Engineering, Bannu Campus, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Pakistan

Department of Electrical Engineering 

UET Peshawar 

Bannu Campus

References

1. Akhter, S., and Arnberg, L., (2009), “A comparative study of porosity and pore morphology in the directionally solidified A356 alloy,” International journal of Metalcasting, pp. 39-52.
2. Akhter, S., Arnberg, L., Di Sabatino, M., Dispinar, D., and Syvertsen, M., (2009), “A comparative study of porosity and pore morphology in a directionally solidified A356 alloy, International journal of metalcasting, winter, pp 39-52.
3. AlMufadi, F., and Irfan, M. A., (2014), “Effect of cooling rates on the three dimensional porosity in permanent mold castings measured by computed tomography”, Materials Evaluation.
4. Anton du Plessis, Stephan Rerhard le Roux, Anina Guelpa, (2016), “The CT scanner facility at Stellenbosch University: An open access X-ray computed tomography laboratory, Nuclear instruments and methods in Physics research, Vol. 385 B, pp. 42-49.
5. Anyalebechi, P., (2011), “Invistigation of the effects of solidification rate and melt hydrogen concentration on porosity formation in aluminum alloy 2024,” EPD congress 2011-TMS annual meeting and exhibition, Vol. 2, pp. 659–677.
6. Boeira, A. P., Ferreira, I. L., and Garcia, A., (2009), “Alloy composition and metal/mold heat transfer efficiency affecting inverse segregation and porosity of as-cast al-cu alloys,” Materials & Design, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 2090-2098.
7. Boromei, I., Ceschini, L., Morri, L., Morri, A., Nicoletto, G., and Riva, E., (2010), “Influence of the solidification microstructure and porosity on the fatigue strength of al-si-mg casting alloys,” Metallurgical science and Technology, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 18–24.
8. Caceres, C., Griffiths, J., Pakdel, A., and Davidson, C., (2005), “Microhardness mapping and the hardness-
yield strength relationship in high-pressure diecast magnesium alloy az91,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 402, No. 1-2, pp. 258–268.
9. Campbell, J., (2005), Castings, 2nd ed. Elsevier.
10. Conley, J. G., Huang, J., Asada, J., and Akiba, K., (2000), “Modelling the effects of cooling rate, hydrogen content, grain refiners and modifier on microporosity formation in al a356 alloys,” Material Science and Engineering A, Vol. 285, pp. 49–55.
11. Dobrzanski, L., Krupinsk, M., and Krupinska, B., (2008), “Structure analysis of al cast alloys,” Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 23–26.
12. Grosselle, F., Timelli, G., Bonollo, F., Molina, R., (2009), “Correlation between microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Si diecast engine blocks, Metallurgical science and technology, Vol. 27-2, pp. 2-10.
13. Hu, M. Y., Cai, J. J., Sun, W. L., Jiang, H. Y., Sang, Y. Y., and Liu, J. T., (2016), “Diecasting simulation and process ptimization of an A356 aluminum alloy polishing plate,” International journal of metal casting, pp. 1-7.
14. Irfan, M. A., Schwam, D., Karve, A., and Ryder, R., (2012), “Porosity reduction and mechanical properties improvement in die cast engine blocks,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, Vol. 535, pp. 108-114.
15. Kaufman, G. J., and Rooy, E. L., (2004), “Aluminum alloy castings: Properties, processes and applications,”
ASM, pp. 47–54.
16. Leo, Prakash, D., Regener, D., and Vorster, W. J. J., (2009), “Effect of position on the tensile properties in high-pressure die cast mg alloy,” Journal of Alloys and Compound, Vol. 470, pp. 111–116.
17. Manas, D., and Makhlouf, M., (2011), “Effect of key alloying elements onthe feeding characteristics of aluminum-silicon casting alloys,” Journals of light metals, Vol. 1, pp. 251–265.
18. Neff, D. V., (2009), “Practices for improving metal quality for high pressure die casting,” The North America Die Casting Association, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 28–31.
19. Salazar, K., and McNutt, M.K., (2013), “Mineral commodity summaries” U.S Department of the Interior, Tech. Rep.
20. Shabestari, S., and Moemeni, H., (2004), “Effect of copper and solidification conditions on the microstructure
and mechanical properties of alsi-mg alloys,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 153-154, pp. 193–198, proceedings of the International Conference in Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies.
21. Sigworth, G., (2011), “Understanding quality in aluminum casting,” international journal of metalcasting,
pp. 7-22.
22. Sui, D., Cui, Z., Wang, R., Hao, S., and Han, Q., (2015), “Effect of cooling process on prsity in the aluminum alloy automotive wheel during low-pressure die casting,” International journal of metalcasting, pp. 1-11.
23. Wang, H. P., Zhao, L., Zhou, B., Liao, H., and Pan, Y., (2009), “Effect of hydrogen content and cooling rate on porosity in aluminum alloy parts by counter-gravity casting,” Zhuzao/foundry, Vol. 58, No. 03, pp. 205–209.
24. Ye, H., (2003), “An overview of the development of al-si-alloy based material for engine applications,” Journal of Material Engineering and Performance, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 288–297.
25. Zhao, H. D., Wang, F., Li, Y., and Xia, W., (2009), “Experimental and numerical analysis of gas entrapment
defects in plate adc 12 die casting,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 209, No. 9, pp. 4537–4542.
Published
2018-12-31
How to Cite
Shah, F., Irfan, M. A., Akhtar, K., Shakoor, A., & Khan, N. (2018, December 31). Effect of Porosity on Mechanical Properties of Die cast Aluminum Engine Block. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 37(2), 67-74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25211/jeas.v37i2.2310