Evaluating the Social Aspect of Sustainable Construction for Pakistan via Analytical Hierarchy Process
Sustainability, Sustainable Development and Sustainable Construction have no universal definition. In the past decade researchers have presented models for sustainability and identified factors for different countries. Most of the definition related to sustainability, sustainable development, and sustainable construction relies on economy, environment and society. This makes social aspect (society) to be of prime importance. This paper focuses on the social aspects of the sustainable construction. Most of the sustainability studies are carried out through questionnaire or interviews. Similarly, this papers also uses the questionnaire for data collection. The collected data is analyzed with Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The pair wise comparison (From To) charts are generated for mean, mode and median independently. The analysis on the basis of mean, mode and median are also carried out independently. The factors are ranked on the basis of their Eigen values obtained from AHP analysis.
(2) (ECIF) E. C. I. F. (2010). Annual Report. of E.C.I Federation (Ed.),Brussels. Retrieved from
(3) Rizwan U. Farooqui S. M. A., and Sarosh H. Lodi. (2008). Assessment of Pakistani Construction Industry – Current Performance and the Way Forward Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information and Value. 1(1),51-72.
(4) Wasti S. E. (2016). Pakistan Economic Survey 2015-16. of Ministry of Finance,Retrieved from
(5) Mebratu D. (1998). Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. Environmental impact assessment review. 18(6),493-520.
(6) Du Plessis C. (2007). A strategic framework for sustainable construction in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics. 25(1),67-76.
(7) Myers D. (2005). A review of construction companies' attitudes to sustainability. Construction Management and Economics. 23(8),781-785.
(8) Ugwu O. O., Haupt T. C. (2007). Key performance indicators and assessment methods for infrastructure sustainability—a South African construction industry perspective. Building and Environment. 42(2),665-680.
(9) Morton R. (2002). Construction UK: Introduction to the Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Limited.
(10) Irurah D. (2001).Agenda for Sustainable Construction in Africa. An Invited Contribution to CIB’s Agenda for Sustainable Construction in the Developing World and Agenda 21 on Sustainable Construction.
(11) Schumacher E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: a study of ecomonics as if people mattered. Vintage.
(12) Pearce D. W.., Atkinson G. D., Dubourg W. R. (1994). The economics of sustainable development. Annual review of energy and the environment. 19(1),457-474.
(13) Dresner S. (2008). The principles of sustainability. Earthscan.
(14) Silvius G., Schipper R. (2015). Developing a maturity model for assessing sustainable project management. The Journal of Modern Project Management. 3(1).
(15) Daly H. E. (1990). Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological economics. 2(1),1-6.
(16) Gunatilake S. (2013).The Uptake and Implementation of Sustainable Construction: Transforming Policy into Practice. United Kingdom (UK): University of Central Lanchashire.
(17) Parkin S. (Year). Contexts and drivers for operationalizing sustainable development. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Civil Engineering. Place 9-15
(18) Barbier E. B. (1987). The concept of sustainable economic development. Environmental Conservation. 14(2),101-110.
(19) Clarke R., Timberlake L. (1982). Stockholm plus ten. Promises, promises? The decade since the 1972 UN Environment Conference.
(20) WCED U. (1987). Our common future. World Commission on Environment and DevelopmentOxford University Press.
(21) Summit E. (1992). Agenda 21. The United Nations programme for action from Rio.
(22) Protocol K. (Year). Report of the Conference of the Parties. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Place
(23) United Nations. (2017). Sustainable Development Goals: United Nations; [cited. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. (August 18, 2017).
(24) Lehtonen M. (2004). The environmental–social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecological economics. 49(2),199-214.
(25) Adetunji I.., Price A.., Fleming P., Kemp P. (Year). Sustainability and the UK construction industry—a review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability. Place 185-199
(26) Meng X. (2012). The Effect Of Relationship Management On Project Performance In Construction. International Journal of Project Management. 30(2),188-198.
(27) Pawłowski A. (2008). How many dimensions does sustainable development have? Sustainable Development. 16(2),81-90.
(28) BRE. (2002). Assessment Prediction Checklist. of BREEAM Office, Building Research Establishment,United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://www.bre.co.uk/pdf/BREEAMchecklist.pdf (November 13, 2017).
(29) Ogunlana S. O. (2008). Critical COMs of success in large-scale construction projects: Evidence from Thailand construction industry. International Journal of Project Management. 26(4),420-430.
(30) Li Y. Y.., Chen P.-H.., Chew D. A. S.., Teo C. C., Ding R. G. (2011). Critical project management factors of AEC firms for delivering green building projects in Singapore. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 137(12),1153-1163.
(31) Tabish S. Z. S., Jha K. N. (2011). Identification and evaluation of success factors for public construction projects. Construction Management and Economics. 29(8),809-823.
(32) Songer A. D., Molenaar K. R. (1997). Project characteristics for successful public-sector design-build. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 123(1),34-40.
(33) Kivilä J.., Martinsuo M., Vuorinen L. (2017). Sustainable project management through project control in infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management. 35(6),1167-1183.